From a Teacher's Perspective, How Has Using Innovative Pedagogy Affected Primary Students' Academic Engagement?

Authors

  • Alaa Ayyad Master, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13387908%20

Keywords:

Innovative pedagogy, primary education, academic engagement, technology integration, play-based learning, teacher perspectives, differentiated instruction.

Abstract

Background: Innovative pedagogical strategies, such as integrating technology and play-based learning, are increasingly used to enhance primary students' academic engagement.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefits and challenges associated with innovative pedagogical approaches in primary education. It aims to understand how digital tools, differentiated instruction, and hands-on activities influence student motivation, participation, and comprehension of key concepts.

Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed, involving qualitative data from teacher interviews, classroom observations, and online sources. The study was conducted in government and non-government primary schools in Victoria, Australia. The sample consisted of 21 primary school teachers selected through convenience sampling. Data collection tools included guided interviews, direct observations of classroom practices, and document analysis of teaching resources and NAPLAN results. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurring patterns and themes.

Results: Findings indicate that innovative pedagogical strategies positively impact student engagement, with teachers reporting increased motivation and participation when using technology and play-based learning. However, challenges such as inadequate teacher training, resource limitations, and misalignment with curriculum goals were noted. The study also revealed inconsistencies between technology use and academic outcomes, suggesting a need for further research.

Conclusion :The study suggests that innovative pedagogical strategies can significantly enhance primary students' academic engagement. However, their success depends on adequate teacher training, proper resource allocation, and alignment with curriculum objectives. Further research is recommended to explore these inconsistencies and optimize pedagogical approaches in primary education.

Keywords: Innovative pedagogy, primary education, academic engagement, technology integration, play-based learning, teacher perspectives, differentiated instruction.

References

Adulyasas, L. (2018). Fostering pre-service mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through the learning community. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012094

Alalwan, N. (2022). Actual use of social media for engagement to enhance students' learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9767-9789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11014-7

Allee-Herndon, K. A., Killingsworth Roberts, S. (2021). The Power of Purposeful Play in Primary Grades: Adjusting Pedagogy for Children's Needs and Academic Gains. Journal of Education 201(1), 54-63. https://doi-org.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/10.1177/0022057420903272

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2018). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers.pdf

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – A systematic review of recent trends. Computers and education, 114, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

Cohen, L. E. & Emmons, J. (2016). Block play: spatial language with preschool and school-aged children. Early Childhood Development and Care, 187(5-6), 967-977. https://doi-org.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/10.1080/03004430.2016.1223064

Chigbu, B. I., Ngwevu, V., & Jojo, A. (2023). The effectiveness of innovative pedagogy in the industry 4.0: Educational ecosystem perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100419

Elsayed, S. A., & Al-Najrani, H. I. (2021). Effectiveness of the Augmented Reality on Improving the Visual Thinking in Mathematics and Academic Motivation for Middle School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1991. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11069

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Herodotou, C., Sharples, M., Gaved, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Rienties, B., Scanlon, E., & Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovative Pedagogies of the Future: An Evidence-Based Selection. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00113

Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2020). Engagement with research: locating, reading, critiquing and reviewing literature. In Learning to Research and Researching to Learn : An Educator's Guide. Cambridge University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/latrobe/detail.action?docID=6185946

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.

Kobylak, K. & Kalyn, B. (2017). Play and Exploration in Grade One: Extending the Principles of Early Learning. Journal of Childhood Studies, 42(1), 32-44. DOI:10.18357/jcs.v42i1.16885

Leon, J., Medina-Garrido, E., & Núñez, J. L. (2017). Teaching quality in mathclass: The development of a scale and the analysis of Its relationship with Engagement and Achievement. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 895-895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00895

Odell, B., Cutumisu, M., & Gierl, M. (2020). A scoping review of the relationship between students’ ICT and performance in mathematics and science in the PISA data. Social Psychology of Education : An International Journal, 23(6), 1449-1481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09591-x

Ok, M. W., & Kim, W. (2017). Use of iPads and iPods for Academic Performance and Engagement of PreK-12 Students with Disabilities: A Research Synthesis. Exceptionality, 25(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196446

Osamah M, A., Ababneh, Z., Bawaneh, A., & Alzubi, W. (2019). Effect of Augmented Reality and Simulation on the Achievement of Mathematics and Visual Thinking Among Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 14(18), 164-185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i18.10748

Rizk, J., & Hillier, C. (2022). Digital technology and increasing engagement among students with disabilities: Interaction rituals and digital capital. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100099

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Simoncini, K., Forndran, A., Manson, E., Sawi, J., Philip, M. & Kokinai, C. (2020). The impact of block play on Children's Early Mathematics Skills in Rural Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52, 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00261-9

Spector, P. E. (2019). Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8

Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456

Swain, J., & King, B. (2022). Using Informal Conversations in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692210850. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221085056

Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: a multidimensional analysis of teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10072-x

Whitlock, B., Eivers, A., & Walker, S. (2023). The state of play-based learning in Queensland schools. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 0(0), 112-126. https://doi-org.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/10.1177/18369391231159672

Zhang, A., Olelewe, C. J., Orji, C. T., Ibezim, N. E., Sunday, N. H., Obichukwu, P. U., & Okanazu, O. O. (2020). Effects of Innovative and Traditional Teaching Methods on Technical College Students’ Achievement in Computer Craft Practices. SAGE Open, 10(4), 215824402098298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982986

Zhao, L., He, W., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Innovative Pedagogy and Design-Based Research on Flipped Learning in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 577002–577002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.577002

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

Ayyad, A. (2024). From a Teacher’s Perspective, How Has Using Innovative Pedagogy Affected Primary Students’ Academic Engagement?. Innovative Multidisciplinary Journal for Science and Technology, 1(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13387908

Issue

Section

Articles